Review



d2r selective antagonist  (Tocris)


Bioz Verified Symbol Tocris is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Tocris manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Tocris d2r selective antagonist
    D2r Selective Antagonist, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 115 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/d2r selective antagonist/product/Tocris
    Average 93 stars, based on 115 article reviews
    d2r selective antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    93
    Tocris d2r selective antagonist
    D2r Selective Antagonist, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/d2r selective antagonist/product/Tocris
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    d2r selective antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Tocris selective d2r antagonist
    Selective D2r Antagonist, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/selective d2r antagonist/product/Tocris
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    selective d2r antagonist - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore selective d2r antagonist l-741,626 (1 mg/kg, dissolved in a 5% ethanol/saline solution; l-741,626;
    Selective D2r Antagonist L 741,626 (1 Mg/Kg, Dissolved In A 5% Ethanol/Saline Solution; L 741,626;, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/selective d2r antagonist l-741,626 (1 mg/kg, dissolved in a 5% ethanol/saline solution; l-741,626;/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    selective d2r antagonist l-741,626 (1 mg/kg, dissolved in a 5% ethanol/saline solution; l-741,626; - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris general d2r family selective antagonist spiperone
    A–C, in the subjective day simultaneous blockade of CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased rod input to cones to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone (1 cone/retina/animal). A, representative examples of cone responses to a series of full-field white light stimuli flashed for 500 ms at increasing intensities (left to right) during the subjective day (control, CTL), subjective day with SR (2 μM; Day, SR) alone, subjective day with the selective D4R antagonist <t>spiperone</t> (5 μM; Day, SPI) alone, and subjective day with co-application of both SPI and SR following prior 30-min application of SPI (Day, SPI + SR). B, average intensity-response curves of cones reveal that cones were more responsive at all intensities tested when recordings were obtained in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, n = 5) or in the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, n = 5) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR, n = 5). C, average cone light response threshold (i.e. intensity required to elicit a 0.5 mV response) was significantly lower during the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, P = 0.005; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR), and in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, P = 0.01612; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR). In addition, average cone light response threshold following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (P = 0.31956) to that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone (n = 3), suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod input to cones at night (i.e. an increase in rod input) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. B and C, data are depicted as means ± SD. Data represent averaged responses to three stimuli at each intensity (1 cone/retina/animal) for each experimental condition. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: not significant.
    General D2r Family Selective Antagonist Spiperone, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/general d2r family selective antagonist spiperone/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    general d2r family selective antagonist spiperone - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Tocris selective d2r receptor antagonist sulpiride (rs)--sulpiride
    A–C, in the subjective day simultaneous blockade of CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased rod input to cones to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone (1 cone/retina/animal). A, representative examples of cone responses to a series of full-field white light stimuli flashed for 500 ms at increasing intensities (left to right) during the subjective day (control, CTL), subjective day with SR (2 μM; Day, SR) alone, subjective day with the selective D4R antagonist <t>spiperone</t> (5 μM; Day, SPI) alone, and subjective day with co-application of both SPI and SR following prior 30-min application of SPI (Day, SPI + SR). B, average intensity-response curves of cones reveal that cones were more responsive at all intensities tested when recordings were obtained in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, n = 5) or in the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, n = 5) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR, n = 5). C, average cone light response threshold (i.e. intensity required to elicit a 0.5 mV response) was significantly lower during the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, P = 0.005; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR), and in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, P = 0.01612; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR). In addition, average cone light response threshold following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (P = 0.31956) to that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone (n = 3), suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod input to cones at night (i.e. an increase in rod input) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. B and C, data are depicted as means ± SD. Data represent averaged responses to three stimuli at each intensity (1 cone/retina/animal) for each experimental condition. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: not significant.
    Selective D2r Receptor Antagonist Sulpiride (Rs) Sulpiride, supplied by Tocris, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/selective d2r receptor antagonist sulpiride (rs)--sulpiride/product/Tocris
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    selective d2r receptor antagonist sulpiride (rs)--sulpiride - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A–C, in the subjective day simultaneous blockade of CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased rod input to cones to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone (1 cone/retina/animal). A, representative examples of cone responses to a series of full-field white light stimuli flashed for 500 ms at increasing intensities (left to right) during the subjective day (control, CTL), subjective day with SR (2 μM; Day, SR) alone, subjective day with the selective D4R antagonist spiperone (5 μM; Day, SPI) alone, and subjective day with co-application of both SPI and SR following prior 30-min application of SPI (Day, SPI + SR). B, average intensity-response curves of cones reveal that cones were more responsive at all intensities tested when recordings were obtained in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, n = 5) or in the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, n = 5) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR, n = 5). C, average cone light response threshold (i.e. intensity required to elicit a 0.5 mV response) was significantly lower during the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, P = 0.005; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR), and in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, P = 0.01612; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR). In addition, average cone light response threshold following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (P = 0.31956) to that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone (n = 3), suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod input to cones at night (i.e. an increase in rod input) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. B and C, data are depicted as means ± SD. Data represent averaged responses to three stimuli at each intensity (1 cone/retina/animal) for each experimental condition. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: not significant.

    Journal: The Journal of physiology

    Article Title: Interactions of cone cannabinoid CB1 and dopamine D4 receptors increase day/night difference in rod-cone gap junction coupling in goldfish retina

    doi: 10.1113/JP281308

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A–C, in the subjective day simultaneous blockade of CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased rod input to cones to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone (1 cone/retina/animal). A, representative examples of cone responses to a series of full-field white light stimuli flashed for 500 ms at increasing intensities (left to right) during the subjective day (control, CTL), subjective day with SR (2 μM; Day, SR) alone, subjective day with the selective D4R antagonist spiperone (5 μM; Day, SPI) alone, and subjective day with co-application of both SPI and SR following prior 30-min application of SPI (Day, SPI + SR). B, average intensity-response curves of cones reveal that cones were more responsive at all intensities tested when recordings were obtained in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, n = 5) or in the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, n = 5) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR, n = 5). C, average cone light response threshold (i.e. intensity required to elicit a 0.5 mV response) was significantly lower during the subjective day in the presence of spiperone (D-SPI, P = 0.005; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR), and in the subjective day in the presence of SR141716A (D-SR, P = 0.01612; unpaired Student’s t test) compared to the subjective day in the presence of both SR and spiperone (D-SPI + SR). In addition, average cone light response threshold following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (P = 0.31956) to that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone (n = 3), suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod input to cones at night (i.e. an increase in rod input) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. B and C, data are depicted as means ± SD. Data represent averaged responses to three stimuli at each intensity (1 cone/retina/animal) for each experimental condition. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: The selective CB 1 R antagonist SR141716A, and the general D2R family selective antagonist spiperone, which at a concentration of 5 μ m selectively blocks cone D 4 Rs in intact goldfish retina ( Ribelayga et al . 2008 ), but not D 1 Rs on cone bipolar cell dendrites ( Chaffiol et al . 2017 ), were purchased from Tocris (Bristol, UK).

    Techniques: Control, Activation Assay

    In the subjective day simultaneous blockade of both CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased photoreceptor tracer coupling to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone.(A–D, representative examples of the extent of Neurobiotin tracer diffusion through photoreceptor gap junction channels in the subjective day under four experimental conditions (see text). Following Neurobiotin injection into individual cones in dark-adapted intact goldfish retinas (1 cone/retina/animal), fluorescence was evident in many rods and cones in the subjective day in the presence of SR (B, D-SR) or the D4R antagonist spiperone (SPI, 5 μM) (C, D-SPI). In contrast, fluorescence was evident in only a few photoreceptor cells in the subjective day (A, control, D-CTL) and in the subjective day in the presence of both SPI and SR following a 30-min SPI treatment (D, D-SPI + SR). In each panel (A–D), confocal images of whole-mount retina at the level of rod inner segments are shown on the left, and perpendicular views of the three-dimensional reconstruction of the rods and cones from the same retina are shown on the right. Some cones (triangles) and rods (arrowheads) are indicated. Scale bars: 50 μm. E–G, average numbers of stained photoreceptor cells (both rods and cones, E), rods alone (F) and cones alone (G) following iontophoresis of Neurobiotin into individual cones (1 cone/retina/animal) in the subjective day (control (D-CTL, n = 5), subjective day with SPI (D-SPI, n = 4), subjective day with SR (D-SR, n = 4), subjective day with co-application of SPI and SR (D-SPI + SR, n = 4) following 30-min application of SPI alone, and subjective night with SR (N-SR, n = 5) for each experimental condition). Prior D4R blockade for 30 min in the subjective day reversed the effect of SR141716A in the subjective day; i.e. following D4R blockade, SR141716A decreased rod-cone tracer coupling, an effect that was significantly different from the effects of spiperone alone in the day (E, both rods and cones: P < 0.0001; F, rods alone: P = 0.01287; G, cones alone: P = 0.03814) and SR141716A alone in the day (E, both rods and cones: P = 0.009; F, rods alone: P = 0.01298; G, cones alone: P = 0.04471). In addition, the numbers of coupled photoreceptor cells (including both rods and cones) following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (E, P = 0.07515) from that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone, suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod-cone tracer coupling at night (i.e. an increase in coupling) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. F and G, statistical analyses (two-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc test; see Methods) were performed to compare the numbers of rods (F) and cones (G) in the four experimental conditions. E–G, data are depicted as means ± SD. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns: not significant. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

    Journal: The Journal of physiology

    Article Title: Interactions of cone cannabinoid CB1 and dopamine D4 receptors increase day/night difference in rod-cone gap junction coupling in goldfish retina

    doi: 10.1113/JP281308

    Figure Lengend Snippet: In the subjective day simultaneous blockade of both CB1Rs and D4Rs following 30-min blockade of D4Rs decreased photoreceptor tracer coupling to a greater extent than did blockade of CB1Rs alone or blockade of D4Rs alone.(A–D, representative examples of the extent of Neurobiotin tracer diffusion through photoreceptor gap junction channels in the subjective day under four experimental conditions (see text). Following Neurobiotin injection into individual cones in dark-adapted intact goldfish retinas (1 cone/retina/animal), fluorescence was evident in many rods and cones in the subjective day in the presence of SR (B, D-SR) or the D4R antagonist spiperone (SPI, 5 μM) (C, D-SPI). In contrast, fluorescence was evident in only a few photoreceptor cells in the subjective day (A, control, D-CTL) and in the subjective day in the presence of both SPI and SR following a 30-min SPI treatment (D, D-SPI + SR). In each panel (A–D), confocal images of whole-mount retina at the level of rod inner segments are shown on the left, and perpendicular views of the three-dimensional reconstruction of the rods and cones from the same retina are shown on the right. Some cones (triangles) and rods (arrowheads) are indicated. Scale bars: 50 μm. E–G, average numbers of stained photoreceptor cells (both rods and cones, E), rods alone (F) and cones alone (G) following iontophoresis of Neurobiotin into individual cones (1 cone/retina/animal) in the subjective day (control (D-CTL, n = 5), subjective day with SPI (D-SPI, n = 4), subjective day with SR (D-SR, n = 4), subjective day with co-application of SPI and SR (D-SPI + SR, n = 4) following 30-min application of SPI alone, and subjective night with SR (N-SR, n = 5) for each experimental condition). Prior D4R blockade for 30 min in the subjective day reversed the effect of SR141716A in the subjective day; i.e. following D4R blockade, SR141716A decreased rod-cone tracer coupling, an effect that was significantly different from the effects of spiperone alone in the day (E, both rods and cones: P < 0.0001; F, rods alone: P = 0.01287; G, cones alone: P = 0.03814) and SR141716A alone in the day (E, both rods and cones: P = 0.009; F, rods alone: P = 0.01298; G, cones alone: P = 0.04471). In addition, the numbers of coupled photoreceptor cells (including both rods and cones) following co-application of SR141716A and spiperone in the subjective day was not significantly different (E, P = 0.07515) from that observed in the subjective night in the presence of SR141716A alone, suggesting that the effect of endogenous CB1R activation on rod-cone tracer coupling at night (i.e. an increase in coupling) depends on the absence of endogenous D4R activation. F and G, statistical analyses (two-way ANOVA followed by LSD post hoc test; see Methods) were performed to compare the numbers of rods (F) and cones (G) in the four experimental conditions. E–G, data are depicted as means ± SD. Some data points overlap. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns: not significant. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

    Article Snippet: The selective CB 1 R antagonist SR141716A, and the general D2R family selective antagonist spiperone, which at a concentration of 5 μ m selectively blocks cone D 4 Rs in intact goldfish retina ( Ribelayga et al . 2008 ), but not D 1 Rs on cone bipolar cell dendrites ( Chaffiol et al . 2017 ), were purchased from Tocris (Bristol, UK).

    Techniques: Diffusion-based Assay, Injection, Fluorescence, Control, Staining, Activation Assay